TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
TEAM International (4.0/5) edges ahead of Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) overall. TEAM International is the better choice for US buyers wanting a domestic legal entity with multi-country delivery. Berezha Security Group is the stronger option for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | TEAM International | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2014 |
| HQ | Lake Mary, Florida, USA (first international R&D center in Kharkiv, Ukraine) | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 1,000+ | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A US headquarters paired with delivery spread across seven countries, Ukraine included | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and staff-augmentation engagements | Fixed-scope security engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, React | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools |
| Industries served | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group: overview
TEAM International
TEAM International's first R&D center outside the US was in Kharkiv, opened not long after the company's 2004 founding in Lake Mary, Florida; the company has since expanded to Lviv and Kyiv and now employs more than 1,000 people across delivery hubs in the US, Ukraine, Poland, Colombia, Portugal, Mexico, and Argentina. That multi-country footprint gives buyers a nearshore and offshore blend rather than Ukraine-only delivery, useful for continuity planning, though it means Ukraine is one option among several rather than the company's sole base. Its US headquarters also gives American buyers a domestic legal entity to contract with directly.
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Services and capabilities: TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group
| Capability | TEAM International | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group
| Framework / platform | TEAM International | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group
| Criterion | TEAM International | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Staff augmentation, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group
| Dimension | TEAM International | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
| Best use cases | A US company wanting a domestic legal entity while still accessing Ukraine-based engineering talent., A buyer that wants delivery risk spread across multiple nearshore and offshore countries. | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. |
| Typical project type | Staff augmentation | Fixed project |
TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group: pros and cons
| TEAM International | |
|---|---|
| + | US-headquartered legal entity simplifies contracting for American buyers. |
| + | Delivery spread across seven countries reduces single-region risk. |
| + | Kharkiv was its founding international R&D hub, giving genuine multi-decade Ukraine experience. |
| - | Ukraine is one of several delivery countries rather than the company's exclusive base, so buyers wanting Ukraine-concentrated delivery should confirm team location |
| - | Multi-country structure adds coordination overhead compared with a single-office boutique |
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
Who should choose TEAM International?
A typical fit: a US company wanting a domestic legal entity while still accessing Ukraine-based engineering talent.
A US headquarters paired with delivery spread across seven countries, Ukraine included. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare.
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Decision matrix: TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | TEAM International |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | TEAM International |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: TEAM International (Not published) vs Berezha Security Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | TEAM International |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | TEAM International |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group
| Use case | TEAM International fit | Berezha Security Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A US company wanting a domestic legal entity while still accessing Ukraine-based engineering talent. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer that wants delivery risk spread across multiple nearshore and offshore countries. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group
TEAM International (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. A US headquarters paired with delivery spread across seven countries, Ukraine included.
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. If your situation matches that, Berezha Security Group is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
TEAM International vs Berezha Security Group FAQ
Is TEAM International better than Berezha Security Group?
TEAM International (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. TEAM International's strongest advantage: US-headquartered legal entity simplifies contracting for American buyers. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item.
How do TEAM International and Berezha Security Group differ in pricing?
TEAM International uses dedicated-team and staff-augmentation engagements pricing. Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: TEAM International or Berezha Security Group?
Berezha Security Group is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between TEAM International and Berezha Security Group?
TEAM International's primary differentiator is: a US headquarters paired with delivery spread across seven countries, Ukraine included. Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. They also differ in team size (1,000+ vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Retail vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.