SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
SoftServe (4.6/5) edges ahead of Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) overall. SoftServe is the better choice for large enterprises running multi-team digital transformation programs. Berezha Security Group is the stronger option for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | SoftServe | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2014 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine / Austin, Texas (dual headquarters) | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 13,000+ | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Scale and three decades of delivery history that few Ukrainian-founded firms can match | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting engagements, typically dedicated-team or fixed-scope programs | Fixed-scope security engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, GCP | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Financial services, Energy, Retail | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group: overview
SoftServe
Few Ukrainian-founded technology companies operate at SoftServe's scale: more than 13,000 people across dual headquarters in Lviv and Austin, Texas, three decades after its 1993 founding in Lviv. The company covers the full range of custom software, cloud, data, and AI consulting work, and its scale gives it delivery capacity for large multi-team programs that most boutique Ukrainian firms simply cannot match. It has built out dedicated practices for healthcare, energy, retail, and financial services, with the certifications and compliance experience those regulated industries require. That scale comes with a trade-off: SoftServe reads and prices more like a global systems integrator than a founder-led boutique.
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Services and capabilities: SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group
| Capability | SoftServe | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group
| Framework / platform | SoftServe | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group
| Criterion | SoftServe | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group
| Dimension | SoftServe | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Financial services, Energy | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
| Best use cases | A large enterprise running a multi-year, multi-team digital transformation program that needs a large delivery bench., A regulated healthcare or financial services buyer that needs an established compliance track record before signing. | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group: pros and cons
| SoftServe | |
|---|---|
| + | Largest and most established Ukrainian-founded engineering organization, with three decades of delivery history. |
| + | Dual Lviv/Austin headquarters gives US-based buyers an onshore point of contact alongside the Ukraine delivery centers. |
| + | Deep bench across cloud, data, and AI consulting, not just custom development capacity. |
| + | Established compliance track record in healthcare and financial services. |
| - | Enterprise-scale pricing and process overhead that a smaller team or a short pilot project may not need |
| - | Client relationship usually runs through account-management layers rather than the direct founder access a boutique offers |
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
Who should choose SoftServe?
A typical fit: a large enterprise running a multi-year, multi-team digital transformation program that needs a large delivery bench.
Scale and three decades of delivery history that few Ukrainian-founded firms can match. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial services, Energy, Retail.
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Decision matrix: SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | SoftServe |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | SoftServe |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: SoftServe (Not published) vs Berezha Security Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | SoftServe |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | SoftServe |
Use case fit: SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group
| Use case | SoftServe fit | Berezha Security Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A large enterprise running a multi-year, multi-team digital transformation program that needs a large delivery bench. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A regulated healthcare or financial services buyer that needs an established compliance track record before signing. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group
SoftServe (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. Scale and three decades of delivery history that few Ukrainian-founded firms can match.
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. If your situation matches that, Berezha Security Group is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
SoftServe vs Berezha Security Group FAQ
Is SoftServe better than Berezha Security Group?
SoftServe (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. SoftServe's strongest advantage: largest and most established Ukrainian-founded engineering organization, with three decades of delivery history. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item.
How do SoftServe and Berezha Security Group differ in pricing?
SoftServe uses enterprise consulting engagements, typically dedicated-team or fixed-scope programs pricing. Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: SoftServe or Berezha Security Group?
Berezha Security Group is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between SoftServe and Berezha Security Group?
SoftServe's primary differentiator is: scale and three decades of delivery history that few Ukrainian-founded firms can match. Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. They also differ in team size (13,000+ vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Financial services vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.