Leobit vs Berezha Security Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) edges ahead of Leobit (3.9/5) overall. Berezha Security Group is the better choice for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. Leobit is the stronger option for product companies wanting a stable, long-term dedicated team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Leobit vs Berezha Security Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Leobit | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A positioning built specifically around long-term managed development teams | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team engagements, typically long-term | Fixed-scope security engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | React, Node.js, .NET | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools |
| Industries served | Enterprise software, Retail | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
Leobit vs Berezha Security Group: overview
Leobit
Leobit's business model centers on long-term managed development teams rather than short fixed-scope projects, run out of Lviv since the company's founding around 2010, working primarily with mid-size product companies. That long-term staffing model suits buyers who want a stable team embedded in their own product roadmap over years, rather than a project delivered and handed off. It remains a boutique-scale operation compared with the enterprise firms on this list, without a single named industry specialization in its public materials.
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Services and capabilities: Leobit vs Berezha Security Group
| Capability | Leobit | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Leobit vs Berezha Security Group
| Framework / platform | Leobit | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | N/A | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Leobit vs Berezha Security Group
| Criterion | Leobit | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Team extension | Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Leobit vs Berezha Security Group
| Dimension | Leobit | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise software, Retail | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
| Best use cases | A product company wanting a long-term dedicated team embedded in its own roadmap., A buyer prioritizing team stability over short project turnaround. | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Leobit vs Berezha Security Group: pros and cons
| Leobit | |
|---|---|
| + | Positioning built specifically around long-term managed and dedicated teams rather than short projects. |
| + | Lviv-founded and still Lviv-based. |
| + | Boutique scale gives closer client access than a large firm. |
| - | No clearly named industry or technical specialization beyond general custom development |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large parallel programs |
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
Who should choose Leobit?
A typical fit: a product company wanting a long-term dedicated team embedded in its own roadmap.
A positioning built specifically around long-term managed development teams. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Enterprise software, Retail.
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Decision matrix: Leobit vs Berezha Security Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Berezha Security Group |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Leobit |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Leobit (Not published) vs Berezha Security Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Berezha Security Group |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Leobit vs Berezha Security Group
| Use case | Leobit fit | Berezha Security Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A product company wanting a long-term dedicated team embedded in its own roadmap. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer prioritizing team stability over short project turnaround. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Leobit vs Berezha Security Group
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on.
Leobit (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer prioritizing team stability over short project turnaround. If your situation matches that, Leobit is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Leobit vs Berezha Security Group FAQ
Is Leobit better than Berezha Security Group?
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Leobit's strongest advantage: positioning built specifically around long-term managed and dedicated teams rather than short projects. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item.
How do Leobit and Berezha Security Group differ in pricing?
Leobit uses dedicated-team engagements, typically long-term pricing. Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Leobit or Berezha Security Group?
Leobit is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Leobit and Berezha Security Group?
Leobit's primary differentiator is: a positioning built specifically around long-term managed development teams. Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. They also differ in team size (150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Enterprise software, Retail vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.