Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Innovecs (4.1/5) edges ahead of Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) overall. Innovecs is the better choice for gaming studios and healthtech companies wanting a specialist partner. Berezha Security Group is the stronger option for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Innovecs | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
| HQ | Miami, Florida, USA (Kyiv-founded; Kyiv delivery center) | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 800+ | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Named gaming and healthtech practices rather than generic full-stack positioning | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements | Fixed-scope security engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Unity, React, Python | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools |
| Industries served | Gaming, Healthcare | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group: overview
Innovecs
Alex Lutskiy founded Innovecs in 2011, and the company has since built named practices in gaming and healthtech specifically, rather than the generalist positioning most peers use, growing to more than 800 employees with corporate headquarters now in Miami and delivery teams concentrated in Kyiv. That focus shows up consistently in its public case studies and hiring. It occupies a mid-size tier: large enough for real multi-team engagements, but without the enterprise-consultancy breadth of SoftServe or EPAM.
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Services and capabilities: Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group
| Capability | Innovecs | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group
| Framework / platform | Innovecs | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | N/A | N/A |
| .NET | N/A | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group
| Criterion | Innovecs | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project | Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group
| Dimension | Innovecs | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Gaming, Healthcare | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
| Best use cases | A gaming studio needing a Ukraine-based product development partner., A healthtech company that values a specialist team over a generalist outsourcing vendor. | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group: pros and cons
| Innovecs | |
|---|---|
| + | Named specialization in gaming and healthtech, not generic full-stack positioning. |
| + | Mid-size team gives closer founder and leadership access than a 3,000+ person firm. |
| + | US corporate presence in Miami for buyers who want an onshore commercial contact. |
| - | Narrower industry focus means buyers outside gaming or healthtech get less differentiated value than the specialization suggests |
| - | Smaller total headcount than the largest Ukrainian firms limits capacity for very large, multi-team programs |
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
Who should choose Innovecs?
A typical fit: a gaming studio needing a Ukraine-based product development partner.
Named gaming and healthtech practices rather than generic full-stack positioning. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Gaming, Healthcare.
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Decision matrix: Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Innovecs |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Innovecs |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Innovecs (Not published) vs Berezha Security Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Berezha Security Group |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group
| Use case | Innovecs fit | Berezha Security Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A gaming studio needing a Ukraine-based product development partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A healthtech company that values a specialist team over a generalist outsourcing vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group
Innovecs (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. Named gaming and healthtech practices rather than generic full-stack positioning.
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. If your situation matches that, Berezha Security Group is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Innovecs vs Berezha Security Group FAQ
Is Innovecs better than Berezha Security Group?
Innovecs (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Innovecs's strongest advantage: named specialization in gaming and healthtech, not generic full-stack positioning. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item.
How do Innovecs and Berezha Security Group differ in pricing?
Innovecs uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Innovecs or Berezha Security Group?
Berezha Security Group is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Innovecs and Berezha Security Group?
Innovecs's primary differentiator is: named gaming and healthtech practices rather than generic full-stack positioning. Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. They also differ in team size (800+ vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Gaming, Healthcare vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.