EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (4.2/5) edges ahead of Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for large enterprises requiring a publicly traded, audited vendor. Berezha Security Group is the stronger option for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2014 |
| HQ | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA (large Ukraine delivery centers) | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Public-company scale and a multi-country delivery network, with Ukraine as one of its largest hubs | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting and dedicated-team engagements | Fixed-scope security engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, Cloud platforms, Data engineering | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools |
| Industries served | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Travel | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems trades on the New York Stock Exchange, which sets it apart from every other company reviewed here: it's a publicly audited, multi-billion-dollar corporation headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, founded in 1993, with Ukraine long standing as one of its largest delivery geographies alongside Belarus, Poland, and India. It has consistently ranked among the top IT employers in Ukraine by revenue, and its scale gives it engineering and consulting practices spanning cloud, data, AI, and enterprise platform work that most single-country firms cannot replicate. As with GlobalLogic, the trade-off is similar: EPAM uses Ukraine as one of several delivery hubs rather than operating as a Ukraine-founded or Ukraine-owned business, and its size means engagements typically run through formal enterprise sales and account-management processes.
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group
| Capability | EPAM Systems | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting | Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
| Best use cases | A Fortune 500 buyer that requires a publicly traded vendor for procurement or compliance reasons., An enterprise consolidating multiple regional delivery centers under one large vendor. | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded scale with audited financials, useful for enterprise procurement teams that require vendor financial transparency. |
| + | Consulting and engineering practices spanning cloud, data, AI, and platform modernization, not just development capacity. |
| + | Long track record as one of Ukraine's largest IT employers by revenue. |
| - | Global public-company scale means engagement minimums, sales cycles, and account structures typically suit large enterprise budgets, not smaller projects |
| - | Ukraine is one of several delivery geographies rather than the company's origin or headquarters |
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a Fortune 500 buyer that requires a publicly traded vendor for procurement or compliance reasons.
Public-company scale and a multi-country delivery network, with Ukraine as one of its largest hubs. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Travel.
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Berezha Security Group |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not published) vs Berezha Security Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | EPAM Systems |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | Berezha Security Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Fortune 500 buyer that requires a publicly traded vendor for procurement or compliance reasons. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An enterprise consolidating multiple regional delivery centers under one large vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group
EPAM Systems (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. Public-company scale and a multi-country delivery network, with Ukraine as one of its largest hubs.
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. If your situation matches that, Berezha Security Group is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs Berezha Security Group FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than Berezha Security Group?
EPAM Systems (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: publicly traded scale with audited financials, useful for enterprise procurement teams that require vendor financial transparency. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item.
How do EPAM Systems and Berezha Security Group differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses enterprise consulting and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or Berezha Security Group?
Berezha Security Group is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and Berezha Security Group?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: public-company scale and a multi-country delivery network, with Ukraine as one of its largest hubs. Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. They also differ in team size (50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Retail vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.