Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Ciklum (4.2/5) edges ahead of Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) overall. Ciklum is the better choice for enterprises wanting large-scale, internationally diversified product engineering. Berezha Security Group is the stronger option for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Ciklum | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2002 | 2014 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom (Kyiv-founded; large Ukraine delivery centers) | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | ~3,900 | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Two decades of Ukraine-rooted delivery scale, now operating under a London holding structure | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Fixed-scope security engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, React, Data engineering | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools |
| Industries served | Retail, Financial services, Media | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group: overview
Ciklum
Ciklum's legal headquarters sits in London today, even though the company was founded in Kyiv back in 2002 and still runs a large share of its roughly 3,900-person team out of Ukraine. It positions itself as a full-lifecycle product engineering partner, taking a project from discovery through cloud deployment across cloud, data, and digital work, competing at a scale closer to SoftServe or GlobalLogic than to the mid-size boutiques on this list, and it broadened its geographic and skill footprint through acquisitions along the way. Buyers who prioritize a Ukraine-headquartered vendor specifically, rather than a Ukraine-delivered one, should verify current corporate structure before assuming this is still a Ukraine-domiciled company.
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Services and capabilities: Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group
| Capability | Ciklum | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group
| Framework / platform | Ciklum | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group
| Criterion | Ciklum | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group
| Dimension | Ciklum | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Financial services, Media | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
| Best use cases | An enterprise client that wants a large, internationally diversified engineering partner with Ukraine delivery roots., A product company needing delivery managed from discovery through cloud deployment. | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group: pros and cons
| Ciklum | |
|---|---|
| + | Large delivery capacity built up over two decades, with real multi-team program experience. |
| + | Broadened its geographic and skill footprint through acquisitions rather than staying single-country. |
| + | Full-lifecycle product engineering practice, not narrowly staffing-focused. |
| - | Legal headquarters moved from Kyiv to London, so buyers wanting a Ukraine-domiciled vendor should verify current corporate structure directly |
| - | Scale and process overhead closer to an enterprise integrator than a founder-led boutique |
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
Who should choose Ciklum?
A typical fit: an enterprise client that wants a large, internationally diversified engineering partner with Ukraine delivery roots.
Two decades of Ukraine-rooted delivery scale, now operating under a London holding structure. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media.
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Decision matrix: Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Ciklum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Ciklum |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Ciklum (Not published) vs Berezha Security Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Ciklum |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group
| Use case | Ciklum fit | Berezha Security Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An enterprise client that wants a large, internationally diversified engineering partner with Ukraine delivery roots. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing delivery managed from discovery through cloud deployment. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group
Ciklum (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. Two decades of Ukraine-rooted delivery scale, now operating under a London holding structure.
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. If your situation matches that, Berezha Security Group is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Ciklum vs Berezha Security Group FAQ
Is Ciklum better than Berezha Security Group?
Ciklum (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Ciklum's strongest advantage: large delivery capacity built up over two decades, with real multi-team program experience. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item.
How do Ciklum and Berezha Security Group differ in pricing?
Ciklum uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Ciklum or Berezha Security Group?
Berezha Security Group is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Ciklum and Berezha Security Group?
Ciklum's primary differentiator is: two decades of Ukraine-rooted delivery scale, now operating under a London holding structure. Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. They also differ in team size (~3,900 vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail, Financial services vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.