Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) edges ahead of Euristiq (3.8/5) overall. Berezha Security Group is the better choice for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. Euristiq is the stronger option for canadian and EU buyers wanting local contacts with Ukraine-based delivery. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Berezha Security Group | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| HQ | Kyiv, Ukraine | Lviv, Ukraine / Toronto, Canada / Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) | 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on | A relatively young company that has already built commercial presence in both Canada and the EU |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope security engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools | React, Node.js, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector | Retail, Fintech |
Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq: overview
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Euristiq
Lviv, Toronto, and Warsaw all host Euristiq offices, a multi-market footprint the company built relatively quickly since launching in 2016. That commercial presence in both North America and the EU sits alongside its Ukrainian delivery base, useful for buyers in either market. As one of the newer firms on this list, it has a shorter track record than the decades-old companies here, which is worth weighing against the multi-market presence it has built in a short time; its public work spans general product development rather than a single named vertical.
Services and capabilities: Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq
| Capability | Berezha Security Group | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq
| Framework / platform | Berezha Security Group | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | N/A |
| .NET | N/A | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq
| Criterion | Berezha Security Group | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Consulting | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq
| Dimension | Berezha Security Group | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector | Retail, Fintech |
| Best use cases | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | A Canadian or EU buyer wanting a local commercial contact alongside Ukraine-based delivery., A startup wanting a newer, more nimble vendor over an established enterprise firm. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq: pros and cons
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
| Euristiq | |
|---|---|
| + | Commercial presence in both Canada and the EU, useful for buyers in either market. |
| + | Built a multi-country footprint relatively quickly since its 2016 launch. |
| - | Shorter operating history than most peers on this list, with less multi-year track record to evaluate |
| - | No clearly named industry or technical specialization |
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Who should choose Euristiq?
A typical fit: a Canadian or EU buyer wanting a local commercial contact alongside Ukraine-based delivery.
A relatively young company that has already built commercial presence in both Canada and the EU. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Berezha Security Group |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Euristiq |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Berezha Security Group (Not published) vs Euristiq (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Berezha Security Group |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq
| Use case | Berezha Security Group fit | Euristiq fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A Canadian or EU buyer wanting a local commercial contact alongside Ukraine-based delivery. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A startup wanting a newer, more nimble vendor over an established enterprise firm. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on.
Euristiq (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need a startup wanting a newer, more nimble vendor over an established enterprise firm. If your situation matches that, Euristiq is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Berezha Security Group vs Euristiq FAQ
Is Berezha Security Group better than Euristiq?
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. Euristiq's strongest advantage: commercial presence in both Canada and the EU, useful for buyers in either market.
How do Berezha Security Group and Euristiq differ in pricing?
Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Euristiq uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Berezha Security Group or Euristiq?
Euristiq is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Berezha Security Group and Euristiq?
Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Euristiq's primary differentiator is: a relatively young company that has already built commercial presence in both Canada and the EU. They also differ in team size (50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) vs 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Retail, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.