EPAM Systems vs Yalantis: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (4.2/5) edges ahead of Yalantis (4.1/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for large enterprises requiring a publicly traded, audited vendor. Yalantis is the stronger option for healthtech and IoT product companies needing compliance-aware development. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs Yalantis: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2008 |
| HQ | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA (large Ukraine delivery centers) | Warsaw, Poland (Dnipro-founded) |
| Team size | 50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce | 201–500 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Public-company scale and a multi-country delivery network, with Ukraine as one of its largest hubs | A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting and dedicated-team engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, Cloud platforms, Data engineering | React Native, Node.js, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Travel | Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech |
EPAM Systems vs Yalantis: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems trades on the New York Stock Exchange, which sets it apart from every other company reviewed here: it's a publicly audited, multi-billion-dollar corporation headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, founded in 1993, with Ukraine long standing as one of its largest delivery geographies alongside Belarus, Poland, and India. It has consistently ranked among the top IT employers in Ukraine by revenue, and its scale gives it engineering and consulting practices spanning cloud, data, AI, and enterprise platform work that most single-country firms cannot replicate. As with GlobalLogic, the trade-off is similar: EPAM uses Ukraine as one of several delivery hubs rather than operating as a Ukraine-founded or Ukraine-owned business, and its size means engagements typically run through formal enterprise sales and account-management processes.
Yalantis
Yalantis started in Dnipro in 2008 and has since relocated its corporate headquarters to Warsaw, while its public case studies keep circling back to compliant healthcare and IoT product work, run by a team in the 201-500 range. Healthcare compliance work is a visible part of its positioning, alongside logistics and fintech projects, which points to real regulatory experience rather than a checkbox industry list. As with several peers, the Warsaw relocation means a buyer specifically seeking a Ukraine-headquartered vendor should confirm current corporate domicile rather than assume it from the company's Ukrainian origin.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs Yalantis
| Capability | EPAM Systems | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✗ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs Yalantis
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs Yalantis
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs Yalantis
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare | Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech |
| Best use cases | A Fortune 500 buyer that requires a publicly traded vendor for procurement or compliance reasons., An enterprise consolidating multiple regional delivery centers under one large vendor. | A healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development., An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
EPAM Systems vs Yalantis: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded scale with audited financials, useful for enterprise procurement teams that require vendor financial transparency. |
| + | Consulting and engineering practices spanning cloud, data, AI, and platform modernization, not just development capacity. |
| + | Long track record as one of Ukraine's largest IT employers by revenue. |
| - | Global public-company scale means engagement minimums, sales cycles, and account structures typically suit large enterprise budgets, not smaller projects |
| - | Ukraine is one of several delivery geographies rather than the company's origin or headquarters |
| Yalantis | |
|---|---|
| + | Visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies. |
| + | Mid-size team large enough for real product programs but still founder-accessible. |
| + | Warsaw headquarters gives an EU corporate entity for buyers who want that structure. |
| - | Headquarters relocated from Ukraine to Poland, so this is not strictly a Ukraine-domiciled vendor despite its Ukrainian founding |
| - | Team size caps the number of concurrent large programs it can staff compared with the biggest firms on this list |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a Fortune 500 buyer that requires a publicly traded vendor for procurement or compliance reasons.
Public-company scale and a multi-country delivery network, with Ukraine as one of its largest hubs. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Travel.
Who should choose Yalantis?
A typical fit: a healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development.
A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs Yalantis
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Yalantis |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not published) vs Yalantis (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | EPAM Systems |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs Yalantis
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | Yalantis fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Fortune 500 buyer that requires a publicly traded vendor for procurement or compliance reasons. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An enterprise consolidating multiple regional delivery centers under one large vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs Yalantis
EPAM Systems (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. Public-company scale and a multi-country delivery network, with Ukraine as one of its largest hubs.
Yalantis (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need an IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. If your situation matches that, Yalantis is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs Yalantis FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than Yalantis?
EPAM Systems (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: publicly traded scale with audited financials, useful for enterprise procurement teams that require vendor financial transparency. Yalantis's strongest advantage: visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies.
How do EPAM Systems and Yalantis differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses enterprise consulting and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Yalantis uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or Yalantis?
Yalantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and Yalantis?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: public-company scale and a multi-country delivery network, with Ukraine as one of its largest hubs. Yalantis's primary differentiator is: a compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice. They also differ in team size (50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce vs 201–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Retail vs Healthcare, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.